Zum Inhalt springen

Auflösung eines Ideals/Erste Syzygien/Motivierendes Beispiel für lokal frei/en/Textabschnitt

Aus Wikiversity

Let R be a commutative ring and let I be an ideal generated by finitely many elements I=(f1,,fn). The free resolution of the residue class ring R/I is the exact complex

Rn2Rnf1,,fnRR/I0.

This resolution goes (unless I has finite projective dimension) on forever, but we can break it up to obtain the exact complex

0M=Syz(f1,,fn)Rnf1,,fnRR/I0,

where the module M is just defined to be the kernel of the R-module-homomorphism

RnR,(s1,,sn)i=1nsifi.

This kernel consists exactly of the syzygies for these elements, hence it is called (the first) syzygy module. This module can be already quite complicated, however, we can make the following observation. Let us fix one i, say i=1, and look at the induced sequence over the localization Rf1. As localization is an exact functor, we still get an exact sequence, and since f1I, the ideal If1 contains now a unit and therefore we have (R/I)f1=0, so we can rewrite the induced sequence as

0Mf1(Rf1)nf1,,fnRf10.

We claim that we have an Rf1-module isomorphism

(Rf1)n1Mf1(Syz(f1,,fn))f1

by sending the j-th standard vector ej (j=2,,n) to

vj=(fjf1,,0,1,0,,0)

(the 1 stands at the jth position). This is obviously well-defined, since f1 is a unit in Rf1, and evidently the given tuple is a syzygy. If s=(s1,,sn) is a syzygy, then j=2nsjej is a preimage, since it is mapped under this homomorphism to

j=2nsjvj=(j=2nsjfjf1,s2,,sn)=(s1,s2,,sn).

Hence we have a surjection. The injectivity follows immediately by looking at the components 2 to n in the syzygy.

This means that the syzygy module when restricted to the open subset D(f1) (viewed as an Rf1-module) is free of rank n1, and the same holds for all D(fj). Hence the syzygy module restricted to the open subset

U=j=1nD(fj)

has the property that there exists a covering by open subsets such that the restrictions to these open subsets are free modules. In general, the syzygy module is not free as an R-module nor as an 𝒪U-module on U. The above given explicit isomorphism on D(f1) (such an isomorphism is called a local trivialization of M on D(f1)) uses that f1 is a unit, hence this can not be extended to give an isomorphism on U.

On the intersection D(f1)D(f2)=D(f1f2) f1 as well as f2 are units, hence the above isomorphisms (let's call them ψ1 on D(f1) and ψ2 on D(f2)) induce two different isomorphisms on D(f1f2) between (Rf1f2)n1 and Mf1f2 We can connect them to get an isomorphism

ψ21ψ1:(Rf1f2)n1(Rf1f2)n1

which is given by the (over Rf1f2) invertible (n1)×(n1)-matrix

(f2f1f3f1f4f1fnf101000010001).