User talk:Mu301

From Wikiversity
Latest comment: 13 days ago by Mu301 in topic Can we save this depression-era photo?
Jump to navigation Jump to search


This is a Wikiversity user discussion page.

This is not a learning resource or the discussion page for a learning project. If you find this page on any site other than Wikiversity you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikiversity itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/User_talk:Mu301.

This is Mu301's discussion page, where you can send messages and comments to Mu301.



Candidate for Custodianship[edit source]

Hi Mike,

Just dropping you a note re Wikiversity:Candidates for Custodianship/MathXplore and wondering if you would be able to take a look some time and close if/when you see fit? I nominated MathXplore, so ideally you could close. Dave Braunschweig on a wiki break.

Hope you're well.

Sincerely, James -- Jtneill - Talk - c 09:45, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Jtneill: Yes, I'll review this weekend. I'm doing well. Thanks for asking. --mikeu talk 22:19, 15 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
checkY Done @MathXplore and Jtneill: See [1] --mikeu talk 14:36, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can we save this depression-era photo?[edit source]

See File:Untitled-91274a-1024.jpg, [2] [3]. The latter two claim (insinuate?) that it is a PD loc image. Is this good enough to get it on Wikiversity? If this does not satisfy "fair use", I don't know what "fair use" is. Come to think of it, I don't know what fair use is. Period.--Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 01:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

The most suitable license on commons is {{PD-USGov}}. See, for example: File:Spark_gap_transmitter_bandwidth_-_2.png. I recommend that we move the image to commons and delete the local copy. We should probably give it a more descriptive file name. I'll take a look at this in a short while. IMHO, there's no point in us hosting a PD. On commons it can be fairly used here and cross-wiki. --mikeu talk 20:20, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
checkY Done - I've moved the file and deleted the local copy. The resource that uses the image looks fine. --mikeu talk 22:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
checkY Done - To clarify - my previous post was the move of File:Depression-overview.jpg. I've just now moved File:Untitled-91274a-1024.jpg. Most of the archival images in the Federal Writers' Project are likely {{PD-USGov}}. By definition, these photos were commissioned and/or published by the US Gov't and are PD. I wouldn't trust a bot to automatically move them. They need to be checked by a person to verify the status. --mikeu talk 03:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
If you want, I can delete these images, but need someone with more knowledge of copyright and WV policy than I to verify. All or most of the scientific images are essential to imported PLOS articles, so we might want to delete the PLOS articles if we delete the images. The photo of two men are on of user:Jtneill's resources and are likely not essential to the page. Let me know and I will be happy to delete.

Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 21:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'll take a look at this. --mikeu talk 22:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Bayesian.png was a duplicate already on commons. I've deleted it and update what links here resource pages. --mikeu talk 00:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 01:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Update: I'm still working my way through these files. I'm not sure what the copyright status is for many of them. --mikeu talk 01:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I've had trouble tracking down the specific image sources. In general, PLOS uses CC BY, CC0 Universal, or Open Governmental License.[4] So, the issue is not so much fair use. It is attribution. It is reasonable to assume that the authors of the PLOS articles that we host created the images included in the article (unless otherwise stated.) This does create a bit of a mess in that there is no clear link from the image back to the creator. --mikeu talk 14:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the LoC files should be moved to Commons and I moved some of them. Sadly the PLOS files have a bad source and we do not know which license creator have chosen. If it is one that require attribution we need to know the creator. So I think the files should be deleted. --MGA73 (discusscontribs) 20:12, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'm generally in favor of keeping files that appear to be free. In this case I support deleting due to the uncertainty of authorship. If we can't be sure that we are correctly attributing the creator then they should not be hosted here. I support deletion. --mikeu talk 02:49, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikiversity:Requests for Deletion#Module:No globals[edit source]

You might be interested in it, as a subpage of your userpage has a link to that module. Liuxinyu970226 (discusscontribs) 11:43, 6 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Yes, that module is deprecated. It appears unused. A deletion is appropriate.[5] --mikeu talk 01:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
Deleted.[6] --mikeu talk 03:24, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Should I delete these pages?[edit source]

I am 90% confident that these pages should be deleted, and I can do them quickly with my touch screen. But there are so many files that I would appreciate verification. Could you take a look at Wikiversity:Requests_for_Deletion#Unused_files_uploaded_by_Katluvdogs?--Guy vandegrift (discusscontribs) 16:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I support deletion of all these unused files.[7] --mikeu talk 01:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)Reply