Benutzer:O.tacke/2013/intro math phil

Aus Wikiversity

Der MOOC ist leider so langweilig gestaltet und birgt keine didaktische Konzeption, so dass ich ihn abgebrochen habe.

Infinity[Bearbeiten]

Introduction[Bearbeiten]

  • Infinity, quite popular subject
  • The world seems to be finite (live span, number of children, ...). Therefore many people thought: "Infinity is left to God." Understanding the infinite then is quite an enterprise... (cmp. Nicolaus Cusanus)
  • Infinitely possible worlds, God would make one of it the world we're actually living in. => Lecture 3
  • Infinitely good could mean having infinitely many good traits.

Arguments and Paradoxes[Bearbeiten]

  • (cmp. Zeno of Elea; cmp. Parmenides)
  • It appears as if there is something, but really, this might be an illusion (cmp. bending in optics)
  • What is an argument? Sequence of statements, first ones are premises, final one is the conclusion (introduced with therefore).
  • Logically valid argument => transitivity (Modus Ponens). A logically valid argument doesn't need the premises to be true in order to be logically valid, but if they are, then the conclusion is also true. => Lecture 2, 4
  • (cmp. Aristotle) Constructing logically valid argmuents
  • Paradox: a logically valid argument in which each premise is plausible if taken by itself, but where the conclusion of the argument is absurd. => method to argue against premises which initially seem to be true.
  • Example: Achilles vs. Turtoise

Zeno's Paradox[Bearbeiten]

Example in detail...

Calculus to the Rescue[Bearbeiten]

  • modelling the problem in numbers
  • boundary issues

Sets[Bearbeiten]

  • lists of elements with irrelevant order or repetition of elements
  • empty set
  • principle of extensionality

Comparing Sets in Terms of Size[Bearbeiten]

  • subsets and proper subsets
  • bijective functions (or correlation between sets in general, pairing off)
  • Example: Galileo Galilei

Diagnosis of Galileo's Paradox[Bearbeiten]

  • Galileo's solution: comparing infinite sets is absurd, "equally many" is a critical term.
  • There are different ways to define dealing with infinity.

Cantor's Theorem[Bearbeiten]

...

Conclusions[Bearbeiten]

...